300 Multiple Choices

The 300 (Multiple Choices) status code indicates that the target
resource has more than one representation, each with its own more
specific identifier, and information about the alternatives is being
provided so that the user (or user agent) can select a preferred
representation by redirecting its request to one or more of those
identifiers. In other words, the server desires that the user agent
engage in reactive negotiation to select the most appropriate
representation(s) for its needs ().

If the server has a preferred choice, the server SHOULD generate a
Location header field containing a preferred choice’s URI reference.
The user agent MAY use the Location field value for automatic

For request methods other than HEAD, the server SHOULD generate a
payload in the 300 response containing a list of representation
metadata and URI reference(s) from which the user or user agent can
choose the one most preferred. The user agent MAY make a selection
from that list automatically if it understands the provided media
type. A specific format for automatic selection is not defined by
this specification because HTTP tries to remain orthogonal to the
definition of its payloads. In practice, the representation is
provided in some easily parsed format believed to be acceptable to
the user agent, as determined by shared design or content
negotiation, or in some commonly accepted hypertext format.

A 300 response is cacheable by default; i.e., unless otherwise
indicated by the method definition or explicit cache controls (see

  Note: The original proposal for the 300 status code defined the
  URI header field as providing a list of alternative
  representations, such that it would be usable for 200, 300, and
  406 responses and be transferred in responses to the HEAD method.
  However, lack of deployment and disagreement over syntax led to
  both URI and Alternates (a subsequent proposal) being dropped from
  this specification.  It is possible to communicate the list using
  a set of Link header fields [], each with a relationship of
  "alternate", though deployment is a chicken-and-egg problem.
What's on this Page